Can Adolescents Benefit from a Recovery Coach?
In addictions recovery there is something magical about ninety days! Research reveals that ninety days is the minimum recommended service dosage for those receiving chemical dependence treatment. The great majority of chemically dependent clients who relapse do so within the first ninety days after leaving treatment (GLATTC Bulletin, 2005), with aftercare often being relegated to an “afterthought” by the treatment community.
Surveys reveal that, among those referred to 12-step groups by the treatment community, the great majority discontinue their attendance within ninety days (Nowinski, et al, 1992 & 1999).
The use of recovery coaches with adults is achieving promising results in helping clients with early recovery and beyond (GLATTC.org, 2005). In Connecticut, Phil Valentine is director of a recovery support services volunteer program. He has recruited 150 recovering volunteers who visit treatment centers and asks clients if they can call them once a week for twelve weeks (90 days) to offer recovery support upon their discharge. According to Valentine, 80% of these individuals receiving telephonic recovery support are sober at the end of the ninety-day period (GLATTC.org, 2007). This is significantly higher than national averages.
A recovery coach is often the person who serves as a guide in supporting individual recovery. His or her primary credential is not possession of an advanced degree; it is the fact that he or she has “been there.” This coach is a lifestyle consultant whose individual story is proof that recovery is possible. The recovery coach differs from a sponsor in that a sponsor primarily supports one pathway to recovery, namely the 12-step approach, while the recovery coach is charged with supporting multiple pathways to recovery. The recovery coach differs from a therapist in that he or she doe not do a lot of probing, uncovering unconscious material, delving into the interactions between the id and superego, and making diagnosis. Instead, he or she provides recovery support ongoing in the client’s natural environment (White, et al., 2006). This is significant, because the great majority of treatment centers often have only one or two contacts with clients following discharge.
The use of recovery coaches is a micro-strategy that falls under the umbrella of the larger approach—recovery management. By definition, recovery management is an approach that shifts from treating addiction in short-term acute episodes toward how we traditionally treat other chronic and progressive illnesses (diabetes, cancer, etc.) (GLATTC Bulletin, 2005). There is evidence that substance use disorders, particularly dependence, are chronic illnesses (McClellan & White, 2002). Yet, we have historically treated them as though they are acute illnesses, i.e., three days of detox, fourteen days of residential treatment, three weeks of intensive outpatient treatment, etc. According to the American Medical Association, chronic illnesses are considered to be in remission after five years of stability.
There are very few five-year chemical dependence programs in the country, leaving most clients with an inadequate service dose. Thus far, most of the emphasis on recovery management and recovery coaching has focused on adult populations. Can adolescents benefit from a recovery coach? My answer is yes, for a number of reasons.
The majority of adolescents with substance use disorders have co- occurring conditions requiring recovery support to help manage the multiple stresses (Riggs & Davies, 2002). Like adults, the great majority of adolescents who relapse do so within the first three months of leaving treatment (Mayeda & Sanders, 2007). Navigating relationships with peers can be a major relapse trigger for adolescents; they can use support in this area (Liddle & Rowe, 2003).
For adolescents, who are the most difficult to reach, there often exists a combination of risk factors that increases the chances of relapse and incarceration, including living in high-risk communities, where there are high crime and poverty rates. Residential treatment can temporarily remove these adolescents from their living environment. They eventually go home, and they can often benefit from support in designing a course to stay sober. Support from a recovery coach who is comfortable interacting with teens in their natural environment can be helpful (Mayeda, Sanders, 2007).
Substance use disorders are “family illnesses” (Sanders, CADC Preparation Manual, 2003). A great majority of adolescents can benefit from recovery support when interacting with their family of origin. In a recent focus group with adolescents with substance use disorders, this author was told that problems within their families was their number-one stressor when leaving treatment.
School Stress
Academic problems are particularly stressful for adolescents with substance use disorders (Liddle & Rowe, 2003). Many have been expelled or have dropped out of school as a result of problems caused by their substance use. They can use recovery support in their efforts to be reengaged with the school climate and to deal with high-risk situations, which can trigger their urge to use.
Adolescents also need social recovery support. In many communities it is seen as “cool” for adolescents to get high. Some of the teens in the focus group told this author that in their communities it seems as though almost everyone gets high. They mention how difficult it is to stay sober in such an environment. A recovery coach can help them learn how to navigate social situations that increase their risk of relapse.
With adult populations, recovery coaches are often adults who have been sober for at least a year or longer. Who qualifies to serve as a recovery coach for teens? Is the ideal coach an adolescent who has been sober for at least one year, an adolescent who has been sober for two or more years, a young adult in recovery who can share his or her experience in recovery, an adult in his or her thirties—recovering or not—or a trained psychotherapist, etc? This question was posed to teens in the aforementioned focus group. The consensus was that an ideal recovery coach would be a young adult, aged twenty-five or younger, with two or more years of recovery. They indicated that, because someone with these criteria was still young, he or she would be someone to whom they could relate, young enough to understand their concerns, yet experienced in recovery. When asked what they considered an “older” recovery support specialist, the teens said “anyone over thirty-five.” They went on to state that they would be receptive to receiving recovery support from “older adults” if they were sincere, willing to be honest, and had a “good vibe.” My interview was with one group of adolescents. It is necessary to continue to explore the question of who qualifies to be a recovery coach with adolescents. Questions to explore include:
- What is the appropriate age of the coach?
- How important is gender-pairing?
- Cultural competence
- Sobriety status (Must the coach be a recovering person?)
- Does the coach need to be technology savvy, as many adolescents today communicate via technology (cell phones, text messages, My Space, etc.)?
- Should the recovery support specialist be called a “coach”?
- Perhaps adolescents would be more comfortable with different language, such as “peer recovery support specialist, etc.”
- What knowledge do recovery coaches need about adolescents in order to be effective?
- Should we use an individualized approach in pairing youth with recovery coaches, with the youth having the final say?
It is commonly said that adolescents are our future, but they are also our present—our right-now! As adolescents develop substance use disorders, they are important enough for us to create the best possible services for them, making sure that they have a voice in the process.
Related
About Mark Sanders
This author hasn't written their bio yet.
Mark Sanders has contributed 4 entries to our website, so far.View entries by Mark Sanders
You also might be interested in
Addicted clients face many obstacles on the road to recovery.[...]
In the 1930s and 1940s, there was a strong working[...]
"Can you help me learn to make relationships work?” was[...]